2019 Sustainability Report
Committed to using financial, natural and human resources wisely without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their needs
Performance Dashboard
Environmental Data
Energy
|
|
FY 2014 |
FY 2015 |
FY 2016 |
FY 2017 |
Fy 2018 |
FY 2019 |
|
Total Energy Consumption (MWh) |
3,228,000 |
3,057,000 |
3,009,000 |
3,058,000 |
3,103,200
|
5,398,000 |
|
Energy Reduction per Unit of Production |
Baseline year |
N/A |
1.8% |
3.1% |
4.2% |
0.0%
|
|
Electricity Used (MWh) |
- |
-
|
848,000 |
859,000 |
861,000 |
1,398,000
|
|
Renewable Energy Used (Thousands of MWh) |
- |
-
|
3 |
3
|
4
|
15
|
|
Energy Reductions Due to Reduction Initiatives (Scope 1, 2, and 3; gigajoules) |
-
|
-
|
15,000
|
27,000 |
32,000 |
243,800
|
Fuel
|
FY 2015 |
FY 2016 |
FY 2017 |
FY 2018 |
FY 2019 |
|
|
Total Non-Renewable (gigajoules) |
- |
5,138,000 |
5,470,000 |
5,626,000
|
12,083,100
|
|
Coal/Lignite Used (Thousands of MT) |
- |
0 |
0
|
0
|
0.31
|
|
Natural Gas Used (Thousands of m3) |
- |
126,865 |
135,100
|
139,400
|
303,900
|
|
Crude Oil/Distillate Fuels (Including Diesel, #2 Fuel) Used (Thousands of m3) |
- |
10,907 |
11,660
|
10,700
|
16,500
|
|
Renewables* (gigajoules) |
- |
2,631,000 |
2,446,000 |
2,446,000
|
2,316,000
|
|
Total Fuel (gigajoules) |
- |
7,770,000 |
7,916,000 |
8,072,000
|
14,399,000
|
*Renewable fuel sources include bark, scrap wood and cardboard
Emissions (Thousands of Metric Tons)
|
|
FY 2014* |
FY 2015 |
FY 2016 |
FY 2017 |
Fy 2018 |
FY 2019 |
|
GHG Scope 1 |
362.3 |
322.5 |
345.7 |
367.7 |
376.7
|
676.0
|
|
GHG Scope 2 (Location-based) |
496.0 |
438.6 |
446.7 |
416.0 |
415.9
|
614.0
|
|
GHG Scope 3 |
251.5 |
221.9 |
2,927.0 |
3,089.0 |
2,867.0
|
4,403.0
|
|
GHG Total |
1,109.8 |
983.0 |
3,719.4 |
3,872.7 |
3,659.6
|
5,693.0
|
|
% Reduction in Emissions per Unit of Production** |
Baseline year |
6.0% |
2.0% |
8.4% |
10.3%
|
11.0%
|
|
GHG Intensity (Scope 1 and 2, total per $ revenue) |
0.00020 |
0.00021 |
0.00025 |
0.00022 |
0.00021
|
0.00028
|
|
Emission Reductions Due to Reduction Initiatives (Scope 1, 2, and 3) |
- |
- |
Baseline year |
25.0 |
25.0
|
3.0
|
|
Percentage of the Company’s Operations That Are Covered in Its Disclosures on Emissions |
- |
- |
100% |
100% |
100%
|
100%
|
Notes:
- Source: Greif 2019 CDP Climate Response
- 2019 energy and emissions data accounts for all legacy Greif and Caraustar facilities.
- Emissions data accounts for CO2, CH4 and N2O
- Scope 3 emissions takes into account upstream transportation and distribution. In 2017, scope 3 was expanded to include purchased goods and services, capital goods, fuel and energy related activities not included in Scope 1 and 2, including waste generated in operations, business travel, employee commuting and end of life treatment of sold products.
- 2019 GHG Verification Statement
*To standardize emissions and inform year-over-year progress toward our 2025 goal, our 2014 emissions data has been restated to correct several facilities’ eGRID regions. Total does not include 246,000 metric tons of CO2e from biogenic sources.
**Our percent reduction in emissions per unit of production dropped from FY 2015 to FY 2016 due to increased fugitive emissions from our Riverville, Virginia, paper mill and total emissions from our Massillon, Ohio, paper mill. Updated emissions and global warming potential factors also contributed to this change. Data based on legacy Greif facilities only to maintain comperability with 2014 baseline.
**Our percent reduction in emissions per unit of production dropped from FY 2015 to FY 2016 due to increased fugitive emissions from our Riverville, Virginia, paper mill and total emissions from our Massillon, Ohio, paper mill. Updated emissions and global warming potential factors also contributed to this change. Data based on legacy Greif facilities only to maintain comperability with 2014 baseline.
Water*
|
|
FY 2015 |
FY 2016 |
FY 2017 |
FY 2018 |
FY 2019 |
|
Water Withdrawal (Thousands of cubic meters)* |
8,365.4 |
8,420.2 |
9,666.3 |
9,360.8 |
13,864.4 |
|
Surface Water |
- | - |
9,242.7 |
8,630.0 |
10,266.8 |
|
Ground Water |
- | - |
423.6 |
730.7 |
3,597.6 |
|
Rainwater |
- | - | - | - | - |
|
Wastewater |
- | - | - | - | - |
|
Municipal Water† |
- |
- | - | - | - |
|
Wastewater Discharge (Thousands of cubic meters)** |
8,255.1 |
7,961.4 |
8,983.2 |
9,316.2 |
11,853.5 |
|
James River |
- | - |
8,788.8 |
8,907.1 |
7,949.5 |
|
City of Massillon |
- | - |
191.6 |
407.1 |
424.0 |
|
Tuscarawas River |
- | - |
2.8 |
2.0 |
2.5 |
|
Sweetwater Creek^ |
- | - |
- |
- |
0.0 |
|
Cobb County WWTP^ |
- | - |
- |
- |
844.9 |
|
Cincinnati Metropolitan Sewerage District^^ |
- | - |
- |
- |
37.6 |
|
Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District^^ |
- | - |
- |
- |
349.0 |
|
Los Angeles County Sanitation District WWTF^^ |
- | - |
- |
- |
196.8 |
|
Three Mile Creek^ |
- | - |
- |
- |
0.0 |
|
Mobile Wright Smith WWTP^ |
- | - |
- |
- |
337.2 |
|
Village of Baltimore WWTF** |
- | - |
- |
- |
0.0 |
|
West Branch Paw Paw Creek** |
- | - |
- |
- |
146.7 |
|
San Jose-Santa Clara Regional WWTP^^ |
- | - |
- |
- |
288.1 |
|
Tacoma Central WWTP^^ |
- | - |
- |
- |
6.9 |
|
City of Fitchburg WWTP^ |
- | - |
- |
- |
322.6 |
|
Iowa River** |
- | - |
- |
- |
291.8 |
|
Cherry Lake** |
- | - |
- |
- |
597.8 |
|
Iowa Tributary** |
- | - |
- |
- |
58.0 |
|
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (Thousands of kg) |
2,080.4 |
1,050.4 |
890.4 |
204.2 |
3,508.3 |
|
Total Suspended Solids (kg) |
489,334 |
546,857 |
465,098 |
349,003 |
875,791 |
|
Phosphorus (kg) |
5,517 |
5,728 |
4,991 |
6,617 | 4,708 |
|
Production (MT) |
637,000 |
665,000 |
690,000 |
713,336 |
1,729 |
|
Consumption Rate (m3/MT) |
13.1 |
12.7 |
14.0 |
13.1 |
8.02 |
Notes:
-
2015 to 2018 data is from Greif’s two paper mills, one of which is located in Riverville, Virginia, and the other in Massillon, Ohio. Historically, these two paper mills accounted for more than 90% of Greif’s global water footprint. They draw from the James River and onsite water wells, respectively. 2019 data includes 12 former Caraustar mills that were acquired and integrated in 2019. All 2019 data is full year data. Quality of wastewater discharged from our mills meets permit requirements. No discharged water was used by another organization. WWPT = Wastewater Treatment Plant.
*Evaporative losses estimated
**Treated with primary clarification, secondary clarification and aeration before direct discharge
^ Treated with wastewater pre-treatment including soluble BOD removal
^^ Treated with wastewater pre-treatment with solids only.
† Greif does not currently track withdrawal of municipal water.
Waste Stream
|
|
FY 2015 |
FY 2016 |
FY 2017 |
FY 2018 |
FY 2019 |
| Hazardous Waste (Thousands of Metric Tons) | |||||
|
Total Waste to Landfill |
0.22 |
0.15 |
0.53 |
1.64 |
2.43 |
|
Waste to Landfill |
0.22 |
0.15 |
0.53 |
1.29 |
1.16 |
|
Incinerated (no energy recovery)**** |
- | - | - |
0.35 |
1.27 |
|
Total Non-Landfill* |
0.41 |
0.41 |
7.10 |
14.10 |
20.72 |
|
Incinerated (with energy recovery)** |
- |
- |
1.20 |
3.37 |
4.07 |
|
Composted*** |
- | - | - | 0 | 0 |
|
Reused† |
- |
- |
0.40 |
1.51 |
0.65 |
|
Reclaimed†† |
0.02 |
- |
0.19 |
0.22 |
0.37 |
|
Recycled††† |
0.01 |
0.04 |
2.01 |
7.60 |
14.08 |
|
Miscellaneous (Non Landfill)†††† |
0.38 |
0.37 |
3.30 |
1.40 |
1.55 |
|
Total Hazardous Waste |
0.63 |
0.56 |
7.64 |
15.74 |
23.15 |
|
Non-Hazardous Waste (Thousands of Metric Tons) |
|||||
|
Total Waste to Landfill |
41.17 |
45.20 |
57.40 |
54.59
|
33.84 |
|
Waste to Landfill Landfill |
41.17 |
45.20 |
57.40 |
54.11 |
33.38 |
|
Incinerated (no energy recovery)**** |
- | - | - |
0.48 |
0.46 |
|
Total Non-Landfill* |
40.83 |
51.90 |
161.80 |
257.22 |
184.36 |
|
Incinerated (with energy recovery)** |
- |
- |
0.95 |
2.05 |
2.95 |
|
Composted*** |
- |
- |
15.28 |
0.35 |
15.78 |
|
Reused† |
0.03 |
0.13 |
17.15 |
11.64 |
12.32 |
|
Reclaimed†† |
0.01 |
0.01 |
13.2 |
9.44 |
9.85 |
|
Recycled††† |
9.8 |
9.1 |
111.86 |
232.00 |
141.22 |
|
Miscellaneous (Non Landfill)†††† |
31.02 |
42.64 |
3.38 |
2.05 |
2.24 |
|
Total Non-Hazardous Waste |
82.00 |
97.10 |
219.20 |
311.81 |
218.19 |
|
Total Waste |
82.63 |
97.66 |
226.84 |
327.55 |
241.33 |
Notes:
- In our 2015 Sustainability Report, we reported our waste stream for our RIPS North America business unit only. In 2016, we expanded our data collection to all of our North American business units. In 2017, we expanded our data collection to all global operations. Data does not include facilities obtained as part of the acquisition of Caraustar. Legacy Caraustar facilities will be incorporated into waste reporting in 2020.
*Non-Landfill: Includes chemical-physical, incineration with energy recovery, recycled, reused, reclaimed, composted and fuels blending treatment methods
**Incinerated (with energy recovery): Treatment method involving the combustion of solid waste that results in energy capture.
***Composted: Treatment method involving the biological decomposition of solid or liquid operational waste
**** Incinerated (no energy recovery): Treatment method involving the combustion of solid waste that does not result in energy capture.
†Recycled: Treatment method involving the separation, preparation and sale of recyclable materials to end-user manufacturers.
††Reused: Treatment method involving the use of a material for its original purpose multiple times
†††Reclaimed: Treatment method involving the process of extracting and converting materials from recycled materials to be used again.
†††† Miscellaneous (Non Landfill): All other treatment methods not mentioned previously, including Deep Well Injection and On-Site Storage, which were reported separately in 2017.
Product lifecycle management (sasb RT-CP-410a.1, RT-CP-410a.2)
|
Raw Materials from Recycled and Renewable Sources (FY 2019, % of metric tons)* |
Percent of Substrate |
Percent of Total Materials Sourced |
|
Total |
71.2% |
|
|
Recycled Content |
13.7% |
4.4% |
|
Steel |
15.0% |
4.1% |
|
Plastic |
5.6% |
0.4% |
|
Renewable Sources |
0.2% |
1.7% |
|
Plastic |
0.2% |
1.7% |
|
Renewable and Recycled Content |
100% |
65.0% |
|
Fibre |
100% |
65.0% |
* As Greif's first year reporting SASB metrics, all figures are estimated based on our current product classifications and reporting practices. Data is reported only for our Rigid Industrial Packaging and Paper Packaging Services business segments and is estimated based on average procurement and manufacturing data across our product lines. 90% of the fiber used in our Paper Packaging Services business segment is sourced from 100% recycled content. 100% of the fiber used in our Paper Packaging Services business segment is sourced from renewable sources. For reporting purposes, 100% of that volume is reported as renewable and recycled content. Our 2020 report will include data with updated assumptions and from additional business segments.
|
Revenue from products that are reusable, recyclable, and/or compostable ($)* |
FY 2019 |
|
Total |
$2,631,808,470 |
|
Recyclable |
$2,444,531,000 |
|
Reusable |
$0 |
|
Compostable |
$187,277,000 |
*As Greif's first year reporting SASB metrics, all figures are estimated based on our current product classifications and financial reporting practices. Data has been aggregated to eliminate double counting. In our Rigid Industrial Packaging and Paper Packaging Services businesses, all steel, plastic and paper products are recyclable. All steel and plastic products are also designed to be reusable. Revenue from these products is counted as recyclable except for coated container board, which is compostable. Greif's fibre drums are recyclable, but excluded from these figures as doing so is not a common market practice. We will begin reporting fibre drums as recyclable when doing so becomes a more common practice in the market. Data does not include revenue from our Flexible Packaging Services business segment or Tri-Sure operating segment. Accurate data is currently unavailable from those segments, however we will include them in our 2020 report along with more accurate estimates across all of our business segments.
EarthMinded Life Cycle Services - Estimated Drums and IBCs Reconditioned*
|
|
FY 2015 |
FY 2016 |
FY 2017 |
Fy 2018 |
FY 2019 |
|
Recycled |
780,500 |
1,045,093 |
904,883 |
849,498 |
831,576 |
|
Steel Drums |
553,300 |
689,513 |
534,369 |
571,355 |
509,884 |
|
Poly Drums |
196,300 |
277,672 |
212,272 |
161,447 |
243,186 |
|
Intermediate Bulk Containers |
30,900 |
77,908 |
158,242 |
116,696 |
78,506 |
|
Reconditioned |
4,076,700 |
3,808,242 |
3,218,885 |
3,258,848 |
3,533,358 |
|
Steel Drums |
3,356,200 |
3,072,348 |
2,565,052 |
2,713,025 |
2,699,393 |
|
Poly Drums |
374,100 |
375,307 |
321,188 |
244,497 |
194,011 |
|
Intermediate Bulk Containers |
346,400 |
360,587 |
332,645 |
301,326 |
639,954 |
|
Total Collected |
4,857,200 |
4,853,335 |
4,136,828 |
4,105,936 |
4,348,706 |
|
Steel Drums |
3,909,500 |
3,761,861 |
3,099,633 |
3,284,380 |
3,193,049 |
|
Poly Drums |
570,400 |
652,979 |
535,460 |
405,944 |
437,197 |
|
Intermediate Bulk Containers |
377,300 | 438,495 |
501,735 |
415,612 |
718,460 |
|
Virgin Materials Saved by Reconditioning and Reuse (Metric Tons)** |
77,773 |
71,573 |
63,111 |
63,587 |
76,400 |
|
Steel |
70,198 |
65,743 |
56,200 |
57,664 |
66,900 |
|
High-Density Polyethylene |
5,742 |
5,830 |
5,150 |
4,243
|
5,900
|
|
Wood |
1,833 |
- |
1,761 |
1,680
|
3,600
|
|
Virgin Materials Saved by Recycling (Metric Tons)** |
12,076 |
17,402 |
18,755 |
16,644 |
16,145 |
|
Steel |
9,657 |
13,288 |
13,463 |
12,697 |
10,918 |
|
High-Density Polyethylene |
2,297 |
3,817 |
4,580 |
3,385
|
4,888
|
|
Wood |
122 |
297 |
712 |
562
|
339
|
Notes:
-
Virgin Materials Saved by Reconditioning and Reuse data has been restated to standardize units across regions
*Estimated Drums and Intermediate Bulk Containers (IBCs) Recycled and Reconditioned (North America and Europe, Middle East and Africa)
**Estimates based on the quantity of reconditioned packaging and average packaging specifications (North America and Europe)
***Estimates based on the quantity of recycled packaging and average packaging specifications (North America and Europe)
**Estimates based on the quantity of reconditioned packaging and average packaging specifications (North America and Europe)
***Estimates based on the quantity of recycled packaging and average packaging specifications (North America and Europe)
rebu – estimated Flexible intermediate bulk containers (fibcs) reconditioned, europe, middle east and africa*
|
|
FY 2015 |
FY 2016 |
FY 2017 |
Fy 2018 |
FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Total FIBCs Collected |
- | - | - |
316,324 |
275,732 |
|
Reconditioned |
- |
- |
- |
224,418 |
179,912 |
|
Recycled |
- |
- |
- |
91,906 |
95,820 |
|
Total Virgin Polyethylene Saved (Metric Tons) |
727.6 |
634.2 |
|||
|
Virgin Polyethylene Saved by Reconditioning and Reuse (Metric Tons)* |
- |
- |
- |
516.2 |
413.8 |
|
Virgin Polyethylene Saved by Recycling (Metric Tons)** |
- |
- |
- |
211.4 |
220.4 |
*Estimates based on the quantity of reconditioned packaging and average packaging specifications (Europe)
**Estimates based on the quantity of recycled packaging and average packaging specifications (Europe)
**Estimates based on the quantity of recycled packaging and average packaging specifications (Europe)
Environmental Operational Policies
|
Climate Change Policy |
|
|
Climate Change Risks Discussed |
2019 Annual Report, page 19; CDP C2.3a |
|
Energy Efficiency Policy |
|
|
Emissions Reduction Initiatives |
|
|
Waste Reduction Policy |
|
|
Water Policy |
|
|
Sustainable Packaging |
|
|
Environmental Quality Management Policy |
|
|
Environmental Supply Chain Management |
|
|
GRI Criteria Compliance |
|
|
Biodiversity Policy |
Social Data
Employment
|
|
FY 2015 |
FY 2016 |
FY 2017 |
FY 2018 |
FY 2019 |
|
Total Employees |
- |
- |
13,171 |
13,066 |
17,042 |
|
Full Time |
- |
- |
11,799 |
12,473 |
16,668 |
|
Part Time |
- |
- |
175 |
151 |
169 |
|
Temporary |
- |
- |
1,197 |
442 |
205 |
|
% Women in Management |
- |
22.0% |
17.0% |
16% |
16% |
|
% Women in Workforce |
- |
24.0% |
25.0% |
24% |
23% |
|
% Employees Covered by Collective Bargaining Agreements |
- |
65.3% |
49.7% |
52.0% |
45.2% |
|
New Employee Hires (Total) |
3,917 |
2,467 |
2,925 |
2,941 |
3,626 |
|
Region |
|||||
|
Asia Pacific |
- |
- |
647 |
560 |
456 |
|
Europe, Middle East and Africa |
- |
- |
991 |
1,279 |
1,074 |
|
Latin America |
- |
- |
240 |
170 |
410 |
|
North America |
- |
- |
1,047 |
932 |
1,686 |
|
Gender |
|||||
|
Female |
- |
- |
782 |
754 |
841 |
|
Male |
- |
- |
2,143 |
2,187 |
2,785 |
|
Age |
|||||
|
16–20 |
- |
- |
202 |
163 |
247 |
|
21–30 |
- |
- |
1,198 |
1,102 |
1,372 |
|
31–40 |
- |
- |
798 |
865 |
1,023 |
|
41–50 |
- |
- |
507 |
568 |
620 |
|
51–60 |
- |
- |
208 |
202 |
315 |
|
60+ |
- |
- |
12 |
31 |
49 |
|
Employee Attrition* |
27.9% |
21.8% |
21.3% |
24.3% |
24.0% |
|
Region |
|||||
|
Asia Pacific |
- |
- |
20.2% |
19.7% |
14.8% |
|
Europe, Middle East and Africa |
- |
- |
39.6% |
40.0% |
31.0% |
|
Latin America |
- |
- |
8.0% |
10.5% |
9.1% |
|
North America |
- |
- |
32.3% |
29.8% |
45.1% |
|
Length of Service |
|||||
|
Less than 12 Months |
- |
- |
50.2% |
48.0% |
49.0% |
|
More than 12 Months |
- |
- |
49.8% |
52.0% |
51.0% |
|
Training Hours per Employee** |
|
|
|||
|
Skillport (Greif Learning Network) |
- |
- |
2 |
2.55 |
5.5 |
|
Leadership, Professional, Production |
- |
- |
9.6 |
6 |
3.2 |
|
Employees Receiving Regular Performance Reviews^ |
- |
90% |
92% |
85% |
92% |
*Attrition by region and length of service given as percent of attrition for fiscal year.
**Average hours of training per unique participant. Data excludes safety training and local functional training. FY2017 data has been restated from the 2018 Sustainability Report to exclude this data. For more information on safety training, please see Health & Safety.
^Includes eligible professional, clerical and administrative employees.
**Average hours of training per unique participant. Data excludes safety training and local functional training. FY2017 data has been restated from the 2018 Sustainability Report to exclude this data. For more information on safety training, please see Health & Safety.
^Includes eligible professional, clerical and administrative employees.
Employee Health & Safety
|
|
FY 2012 |
FY 2013 |
FY 2014 |
FY 2015 |
FY 2016 |
FY 2017 |
FY 2018 |
FY 2019*** |
|
MCR* |
1.59 |
1.49 |
1.45 |
1.2 |
0.96 |
0.95 |
0.98 |
1.49 |
|
LWCR** |
1.12 |
0.97 |
0.97 |
0.78 |
0.57 |
0.55 |
0.57 |
0.69 |
*MCR, or Medical Case Rate, measures the number of recordable injuries per 100 full-time employees in a 12-month period.
**LWCR, or Lost Workday Case Rate, measures the number of recordable injuries resulting in lost workdays per 100 full-time employees in a 12-month period.
*** 2019 data includes Caraustar for only March forward – no data included for first 4 months of fiscal year.
**LWCR, or Lost Workday Case Rate, measures the number of recordable injuries resulting in lost workdays per 100 full-time employees in a 12-month period.
*** 2019 data includes Caraustar for only March forward – no data included for first 4 months of fiscal year.
Social Operational Policies
|
Health and Safety Policy |
|
|
Equal Opportunity Policy |
|
|
Human Rights Policy |
|
|
Training Policy |
|
|
Business Ethics Policy |
|
|
Fair Remuneration Policy |
|
|
Employee Protection/Whistle Blower Policy |
|
|
Anti-Bribery Ethics Policy |
|
|
Policy Against Child Labor |
Supply Chain management
|
Social Supply Chain Management |
Supplier Code of Conduct, Conflict Minerals Policy, Conflict Minerals Report |
|
Supplier Guidelines Encompass ESG Areas; Publicly Disclosed |
Product Data
Product Quality
|
|
FY 2014 |
FY 2015 |
FY 2016 |
FY 2017 |
FY 2018 |
FY 2019 |
|
|
Corrective Action Rate (CAR)* |
Rigid Industrial Packaging & Services North Amerca
|
-
|
1.9 |
1.6 |
1.3 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
|
Europe, Middle East and Africa
|
-
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
1.28 |
|
|
Order Reliability Rate** |
Rigid Industrial Packaging & Services North Amerca |
-
|
99.6% |
99.7% |
99.8% |
99.8% |
99.8% |
|
Number of Customer Complaints |
Rigid Industrial Packaging & Services North Amerca |
672 |
593 |
433 |
389 |
350 |
330 |
|
Asia Pacific
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
334
|
|
|
Europe, Middle East and Africa
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
898
|
*CAR measures customer complaints per 100,000 units produced
**Order Reliability Rate defines the rate of failure between orders produced and estimates non-compliance with voluntary codes. No regulatory failures or resultant fines have been identified.
**Order Reliability Rate defines the rate of failure between orders produced and estimates non-compliance with voluntary codes. No regulatory failures or resultant fines have been identified.
activity metrics (sasb RT-CP-000.A, RT-CP-000.B, RT-CP-000.c)
|
production by substrate (Metric Tons)* |
FY 2019 |
|
Total |
3,551,278 |
|
Paper |
2,319,195 |
|
Plastic |
264,450 |
|
Steel |
967,633 |
*Production figures are aggregated based on primary substrate of finished good products.
|
production by revenue (%)* |
FY 2019 |
|
Paper |
38.8% |
|
Plastic |
17.9% |
|
Steel |
32.0% |
|
Other* |
11.3% |
*Other includes Filling, Reconditioning, Land and Other Misc. Products. Greif does not produce glass.
1.49
Medical Case Rate
Down 57 percent since 2007.
78.4%
Reduction in Biochemical Oxygen Demand
Our efforts in water quality have allowed us to already meet our 10% reduction by 2025 goal.
Contact Us
PACKAGING SUCCESS TOGETHER
DEFINITION